2 results
12 - Forelimb adaptations in Australopithecus afarensis
- from Part II - Hominin morphology through time: brains, bodies and teeth
- Edited by Sally C. Reynolds, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Andrew Gallagher, University of Johannesburg
-
- Book:
- African Genesis
- Published online:
- 05 April 2012
- Print publication:
- 29 March 2012, pp 223-247
-
- Chapter
- Export citation
-
Summary
Abstract This chapter explores upper limb adaptation in
Australopithecus in order to identify possible adaptations to behaviours other than arboreality. Limb length proportions and elbow articular morphologyafarensis suggest that the upper limb of A. afarensis does not display a morphology that implies strong directional, or even stabilising selection, for arboreality. On the other hand, many traits suggest thatA. afarensis adapted to use of the upper limbs for manipulation. The species had no carpometacarpal ligament between the second metacarpal and the capitate, a curved and more proximally oriented second metacarpal-capitate articular surface, and a more coronally and transversally oriented trapezio-second metacarpal facet. All these traits allow for rotation of the second metacarpal during manipulation. In addition, the second and third metacarpal heads ofA. afarensis are tapered with a marked asymmetry in distal view. In palmar view, the articular facet of theA. afarensis second metacarpal is also asymmetrical, with the radial size projecting more proximally and palmarly than the ulnar side. This results in pronation of the second finger during flexion, which allows the finger to conform to the shape of the manipulatedobject. Again, this list of traits is found only in humans among extant hominoids. Other traits such as a relatively longer thumb and a proximally oriented olecranon also suggest that A. afarensis had adapted to manipulatory activities. The absence of archaeological sites contemporaneous withA. afarensis may be due to various factors, such as the use of perishable material, the absence of a home base or of foraging route standardisation, and so forth. In conclusion, it is not possible to positively demonstrate thatA. afarensis made or used tools without finding fossil remains in association with tools, but their morphology is consistent with the finger dexterityand the positioning of hands close to the body that are part of toolmaking and tool-using activities, a novel behaviour for hominins. If A. afarensis was still indeed a habitual arboreal animal, its upper limbs show a compromise for this novel behaviour that was extremely important and that, perhaps, was made possible by the adoption of bipedal stance.
Contributors
-
- By Lee R. Berger, Fred L. Bookstein, Günter Bräuer, Michel Brunet, Steven E. Churchill, Ronald J. Clarke, M. Christopher Dean, Michelle S. M. Drapeau, Sarah Elton, Dean Falk, Andrew Gallagher, John A. J. Gowlett, Colin Groves, Philipp Gunz, Adam Hartstone-Rose, Jason Hemingway, Ralph L. Holloway, Vance T. Hutchinson, William L. Jungers, Ivor Janković, Kevin L. Kuykendall, Sang-Hee Lee, Julia Lee-Thorp, Paul R. Manger, Emma Mbua, Henry M. McHenry, Philipp Mitteroecker, Simon Neubauer, Osbjorn M. Pearson, Travis R. Pickering, Martin Pickford, Sally C. Reynolds, Brian G. Richmond, Avraham Ronen, Darryl J. de Ruiter, Brigitte Senut, Fred H. Smith, Muhammad A. Spocter, Matt Sponheimer, J. Francis Thackeray, Phillip V. Tobias, Peter S. Ungar, Lyn Wadley, Gerhard W. Weber, Milford H. Wolpoff, B. Headman Zondo
- Edited by Sally C. Reynolds, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, Andrew Gallagher, University of Johannesburg
-
- Book:
- African Genesis
- Published online:
- 05 April 2012
- Print publication:
- 29 March 2012, pp viii-xii
-
- Chapter
- Export citation